Thursday, 3 December 2015

RE: Request for information under the Right to Information Act 2009

From: Leanne Purchase <Leanne.Purchase@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 23:41:23 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE: Request for information under the Right to Information Act 2009


Hi Mr Norman,
 
I'm very sorry for the problems with the pdf - I will look into it at my end, so thank you for letting me know.
 
Kind regards,
Leanne.
 
Leanne Purchase I Governance and Planning Coordinator I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3126 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 

From: Ray Norman 7250 [mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 December 2015 10:32 AM
To: Leanne Purchase
Cc: Robert Dobrzynski
Subject: Re: Request for information under the Right to Information Act 2009

Good morning Leanne,

Thank you for your emails and I just now have been able to read the attachment. Given that the PDF was corrupted and upopenable it has required me to seek technical support to get it to open and I thought that I should pass that information on to you for your future reference.

I look forward to the new year when it appears that the information I’m seeking will become available.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman <zingHOUSEunlimited> PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com 40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69




On 3/12/2015 12:09 pm, "Leanne Purchase" <Leanne.Purchase@launceston.tas.gov.au> wrote:

> Hello Mr Norman.
>
> Please find attached a letter explaining the current status of your request
> for information.
>
> Kind regards,
> Leanne Purchase.
>
> Leanne Purchase I Governance and Planning Coordinator I City of Launceston
> T 03 6323 3126 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>
>
>
>
>
> [http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/twitter.png]<https://twitte <http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/twitter.png%5d%3chttps:/twitte>
> r.com/LtonCityCouncil>
> [http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/youtube.png] <http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/youtube.png%5d>
> <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  
> [http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/www.png] <http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/www.png%5d>
> <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  
> [http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/LCC_YVYL.png] <http://api.launceston.tas.gov.au/eCard/disclaimer/LCC_YVYL.png%5d>
> <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or
> document.
>
> ________________________________________
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
>
> Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it
> is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination
> of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies
> and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of
> the information contained in this transmission.
>
> This disclaimer has been automatically added.
 
 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.


------ End of Forwarded Message

RTI UPDATE


Thursday, 12 November 2015

FW: Acknowledgement - Right to Information Request - Rqst Information on Development Application & Assoc...

From: Leanne Purchase <Leanne.Purchase@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:09:46 +0000
To: "raynorman7250@bigpond.com" <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: Re: Acknowledgement - Right to Information Request - Rqst Information on Development Application & Assoc...


Hello Mr Norman.
 
Thank you for speaking with me earlier regarding your Right to Information request.
 
I have attached the acknowledgement we emailed on receipt of your application.
 
My contact details are below if you would like to email or speak with me about progress on your request.
 
Kind regards,
Leanne.
 
Leanne Purchase I Governance and Planning Coordinator I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3126 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au
<http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 
 
 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.


------ End of Forwarded Message

Monday, 9 November 2015

RTI Acknowledgement

Called John Davis today to confirm that the application had indeed been received and it had.

I understood that was to receive a formal acknowledgement
However one hadn’t been received by close of business

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

SUBMISSION: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Dear John,

I have prepared my RTI Application and it is now available online at this URL: http://rti63342176.blogspot.com.au/ Please notify me of the receipt of my application.

You will find a  scan of my CONCESSION CARD at this URL http://rti63342176.blogspot.com.au/ and personal ID information can be found at this URL http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

I have provided a DIGITALsignature on the ONline Form but if this does not satisfy your requirements in regard to verifying the submission’s authenticity please print out 2 COPIES of the form and I will come to the reception desk and sign/initial each page and retain one copy for my records.

This should be more than sufficient in regard to satisfying authenticity. Please let me know if you wish me to call in to sign/initial a HARDcopy of the form.

Likewise, If there is further information that you may require in order to process my application please let me know and I will be more than happy to provide any additional information that you may require.


Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network


PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com
40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com


CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69

Monday, 2 November 2015

Re: Your right to information query

Dear Jemma,

Thank you for your response, an intriguing response, that both clarifies and further mystifies the assessment of  ‘impecuniosity’. Nonetheless, as you say this is a matter for legislation. It is however somewhat reassuring to know that I can in fact appeal your office and that I may get assistance in resolving the subjectivity of impecuniosity via your good offices.

I does now seem that as a pensioner –  with bona fides as such with the Council as a ratepayer with ‘pensioner benefits’ –  I’m likely to be able to deem/declare my own impecuniosity.

Thank you again for your advice.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network


PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com
40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69


On 3/11/2015 9:28 am, "Ombudsman (OHCC)" <Ombudsman@ombudsman.tas.gov.au> wrote:


Dear Ray,
 
I refer to our telephone conversation on 26 October 2015 and your query on the meaning of “impecunious.”
 
The Right to Information Act 2009 requires that all applications must be accompanied by a fee (see section 16). Each application stands on its own and each application requires its own separate fee to be paid.
 
The fee can be waived if the applicant can satisfy the Department or Public Authority that they are “impecunious”. This must be done on each and every application submitted.
 
Because the applicant is the person seeking the waiver, the onus is on the applicant to satisfy the agency to whom they are applying that they are impecunious. I note that your concern is that the word impecunious is vague and subject to interpretation. It is however, the wording the legislation requires be applied. Concerns as to the wording of the legislation itself is not something that can be dealt with by this office as it is a matter for Parliament.
 
The legislation does not set out the criteria for what constitutes being impecunious. There is no list I can point you to.  I note, however, that you stated that you are on a pension. I can confirm that previous decisions of this Ombudsman as well as interstate decisions have found that being the recipient of a pension satisfies the requirement of impecuniosity. I also refer you to page 17 of the Manual and the decision in Stott and Forestry Tasmania, where the Ombudsman accepted that the applicant was impecunious on that basis.
 
Unfortunately, I cannot comment on the specifics of your case. In the event that the Council make a decision that you are unhappy with, you have the power to seek review to this office. Commenting on the facts of your case prior to any such application would be premature particularly given the need for the Ombudsman to remain neutral in circumstances where such a review is requested.
 
Regards
 
 
 
Jemma Dibley
 
Senior Investigation and Review Officer
Right to Information

,   Ground Floor, 99 Bathurst St, (GPO Box 960)  Hobart 7000   
(   1800 001 170

:   www.ombudsman.tas.gov.au <http://www.ombudsman.tas.gov.au/>

We are moving!
Please note that we will be moving to our new office on Tuesday 27- Wednesday 28 October 2015.
From Thursday 29 October, our new street address will be:
 
NAB House
Level 6, 86 Collins Street
HOBART   7000

Our phone number, email addresses and postal address remain unchanged.

Please consider the environment before printing!




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

NOTE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations


It just seems that one, perhaps me in particular, is supposed to be too proud “to give their word that they are broke”. Perhaps here its already cost Council over $37.50 in the time spent on correspondence and it does make you wonder why it is that one has to go to these lengths to get information that should be freely available in accord with the Council’s own Organisational Standards.


CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69

Message
From: John Davis <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:20:21 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations


Hi Ray
 
Re your requests:
 
·      I am still chasing information regarding the DA request.

·      I have checked with our Rates Department and we have your pensioner details on hand - a scan of your card is sufficient

·      Your word regarding your ability to afford the fee is sufficient when submitting your application


Regards
John
 
 

John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 

From: Ray Norman 7250 [mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com]
Sent: Monday, 26 October 2015 6:31 PM
To: John Davis
Subject: RE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good afternoon John,

Thank you for your advice in regard to the form. As discussed by phone I previously submitted a form that was a reconstruction of the online version.

Likewise, as discussed by phone, on this previous occasion I submitted a scan of my pension card  but it seems, that for whatever reason, it has been deemed that this no longer establishes my bona fides. Interestingly Council already accepts that I am a bona fides “pensioner” in that I’m a recipient of Council’s pensioner benefits notably in respect to my rates and the ancillary benefits.

In regard to waiving the statutory fee, despite the previous occasion I’m referring to when the fee was waived, are you suggesting that I have the option of deeming myself to be “impecunious” in the absence of an objective measure, or some other objective criteria, against which I can assess/measure my impecuniousness?

Unless advised otherwise, it seems that in regard to item 8, by implication, you are telling me that there is nothing to be discovered by checking the ‘register of delegate authorities’ given that it seems that Section 62 of the Act is being invoked and presumably Part 2  of it.

Currently I’m awaiting specific advice but while doing so I am preparing my application. I look to your further advice.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman <zingHOUSEunlimited> PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com 40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69








------ Forwarded Message
From: John Davis <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:22:24 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good afternoon Ray
 
You are not required to fill in the Right to Information form on our website, but do need to satisfy the statutory requirements to submit your request. Following the format of the form would be sufficient. However, should you be applying to waive the statutory fee you will be required to submit your application in person as explained below.
 
A pensioner status is not sufficient grounds for the waiving of the statutory $37.00 fee. Section 16(2)(a) of the Right to Information Act 2009 states that 'The application fee may be waived if the applicant is impecunious'. The Ombudsman clarified the meaning of this in his Guideline on 21 April 2012: 'A person is “impecunious” if they do not have sufficient money to pay the application fee.' You would need to advise us that you are unable to pay the application fee.
 
Our process for verifying pensioner status would be for you to bring in your pensioner card which would be sighted and copied by a Customer Service Officer and attached to your application.
 
Your requests can be included in one application.
 
In reference to Item 8, this was the advice provided to me by the General Manager. As you have previously raised this matter with the General Manager and he has responded, I have nothing further to add to my previous response.
 
Regards
John
 
John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au> <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 
 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.


------ End of Forwarded Message

Monday, 26 October 2015

RE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good afternoon John,

Thank you for your advice in regard to the form. As discussed by phone I previously submitted a form that was a reconstruction of the online version.

Likewise, as discussed by phone, on this previous occasion I submitted a scan of my pension card  but it seems, that for whatever reason, it has been deemed that this no longer establishes my bona fides. Interestingly Council already accepts that I am a bona fides “pensioner” in that I’m a recipient of Council’s pensioner benefits notably in respect to my rates and the ancillary benefits.

In regard to waiving the statutory fee, despite the previous occasion I’m referring to when the fee was waived, are you suggesting that I have the option of deeming myself to be “impecunious” in the absence of an objective measure, or some other objective criteria, against which I can assess/measure my impecuniousness?

Unless advised otherwise, it seems that in regard to item 8, by implication, you are telling me that there is nothing to be discovered by checking the ‘register of delegate authorities’ given that it seems that Section 62 of the Act is being invoked and presumably Part 2  of it.

Currently I’m awaiting specific advice but while doing so I am preparing my application. I look to your further advice.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman <zingHOUSEunlimited>
PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com 40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69








------ Forwarded Message
From: John Davis <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:22:24 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good afternoon Ray
 
You are not required to fill in the Right to Information form on our website, but do need to satisfy the statutory requirements to submit your request. Following the format of the form would be sufficient. However, should you be applying to waive the statutory fee you will be required to submit your application in person as explained below.
 
A pensioner status is not sufficient grounds for the waiving of the statutory $37.00 fee. Section 16(2)(a) of the Right to Information Act 2009 states that 'The application fee may be waived if the applicant is impecunious'. The Ombudsman clarified the meaning of this in his Guideline on 21 April 2012: 'A person is “impecunious” if they do not have sufficient money to pay the application fee.' You would need to advise us that you are unable to pay the application fee.
 
Our process for verifying pensioner status would be for you to bring in your pensioner card which would be sighted and copied by a Customer Service Officer and attached to your application.
 
Your requests can be included in one application.
 
In reference to Item 8, this was the advice provided to me by the General Manager. As you have previously raised this matter with the General Manager and he has responded, I have nothing further to add to my previous response.
 
Regards
John
 
John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>

Sunday, 25 October 2015

JD: DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence

Message
From: John Davis <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:29:02 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE: DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence

Good afternoon Ray
 
I will follow up with our Planning Department and get back to you.
 
Regards
John
 

John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 

From: Ray Norman 7250 [mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, 23 October 2015 11:53 AM
To: John Davis
Subject: RTI: DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence

Good afternoon John

Having now had the opportunity to follow up on the agenda item I find that it does not actually include a copy of the DA form.  As I understand it the exhibition copy included an unexecuted form.  This version does not include the form at all.  

My understanding is that the  DA can only be complete if the form is included.  Also, it is my understanding is that the Council's own guidelines state this.

So your referred link does not contain a faithful copy of the complete DA and against this background I now seek your further advice in regard to how I need to proceed in order to get a faithful copy of DA 0331/2015 as originally requested. I look forward to your further advice.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network



PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com
40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69





 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.


------ End of Forwarded Message

JD: The provision of information relative to CoL operations


Message
From: John Davis <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:22:24 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good afternoon Ray
 
You are not required to fill in the Right to Information form on our website, but do need to satisfy the statutory requirements to submit your request. Following the format of the form would be sufficient. However, should you be applying to waive the statutory fee you will be required to submit your application in person as explained below.
 
A pensioner status is not sufficient grounds for the waiving of the statutory $37.00 fee. Section 16(2)(a) of the Right to Information Act 2009 states that 'The application fee may be waived if the applicant is impecunious'. The Ombudsman clarified the meaning of this in his Guideline on 21 April 2012: 'A person is “impecunious” if they do not have sufficient money to pay the application fee.' You would need to advise us that you are unable to pay the application fee.
 
Our process for verifying pensioner status would be for you to bring in your pensioner card which would be sighted and copied by a Customer Service Officer and attached to your application.
 
Your requests can be included in one application.
 
In reference to Item 8, this was the advice provided to me by the General Manager. As you have previously raised this matter with the General Manager and he has responded, I have nothing further to add to my previous response.
 
Regards
John
 
 

John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 

From: Ray Norman 7250 [mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com]
Sent: Thursday, 22 October 2015 8:03 PM
To: John Davis
Subject: Re: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good evening John,

Thank you for your prompt response to my requests. In regard to the RTI Form it is as I recall; only available online; or apparently at the Town Hall reception desk; and in a format that requires that I use a typewriter to fill it in
or do so in my handwriting. As I do not own a typewriter, and in the interests of clarity, I’m assuming that it would be appropriate, and acceptable, to digitally reconstruct the form to enable me to complete it on my computer.

Also, since I am a pensioner I am assuming that the $37.00 fee would be waived in this instance. If so what verification do you require to establish my pensioner status. If not, why am I required to pay this fee and would it apply for each specific request?

In the past I have provided a digital scan of my current pension card. Would that satisfy your administrative need to establish my pensioner bona fides?

In regard to ITEM 8, Are you in fact telling me that the General Manager is operating under Section 62 of Tasmania’s Local Govt. Act? I am aware of this provision of the Act but I have not arrived at a conclusion that it applies by inference and automatically.  Nonetheless, is Section 62 presumed/assumed in this case as I do not believe that Council specifically, or formally, made such a determination?

Maybe Council did make such an instruction, and if so, can you direct me to the minuted record? If it hasn’t been minuted, is there any guidance anywhere to justify what may be the presumably automatic assumption that it is the case? Given that we are dealing with policy determination here I would appreciate your guidance here.

Finally, am I required to provide a completed form for each separate item of information requested? I look forward to your advice in order that I may proceed with the preparation of the information required.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman <zingHOUSEunlimited> PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com 40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69





On 22/10/2015 4:45 pm, "John Davis" <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au> wrote:


Good afternoon Ray
 
I have looked at your request. The majority of the items will need to be assessed under the Right to Information Act 2009. The application form for a Right to Information request can be found on our Website at http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/upfiles/lcc/cont/_council/legislation/right_to_information/17fmx016_rti_application_for_assessed_disclosure_2014.pdf

For item 1: DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence, 18A High St. Launceston (all parts of the Planning Application), this information is available as Agenda Item 8.5 at the Council Meeting on 12 October 2015 and can be accessed at the following link - http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=744
 
For item 8: 8.    Confirmation or otherwise that the General Manager has been granted Delegated Authority in respect to policy determination for the QVMAG, I refer you to section 62 of the Local Government Act 1993 which states:
 
62. Functions and powers of general manager
 
 
      (1) The general manager has the following functions:
 
(a) to implement the policies, plans and programs of the council;
 
(b) to implement the decisions of the council;
 
(c) to be responsible for the day-to-day operations and affairs of the council;
 
(d) to provide advice and reports to the council on the exercise and performance of its powers and functions and any other matter requested by the council;
 
(e) to assist the council in the preparation of the strategic plan, annual plan, annual report and assessment of the council's performance against the plans;
 
(f) to coordinate proposals for the development of objectives, policies and programs for the consideration of the council;
 
(g) to liaise with the mayor on the affairs of the council and the performance of its functions;
 
(h) to manage the resources and assets of the council;
 
(i) to perform any other function the council decides.
 
      (2) The general manager may do anything necessary or convenient to perform his or her functions under this or any other Act.

Please submit the remainder of your requests as Right to Information requests and they will be assessed under the Act.
 
Regards
John
 

John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au> <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 

From: Ray Norman 7250 [mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 3:52 PM
To: John Davis
Cc: Peter Gutwein [Min Local Govt Tas]; Phillip Hoysted [Dir Local Govt]
Subject: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good Afternoon,

Further to our telephone conversation earlier today there are a series questions that I have raised with Council via the General Manager and the Mayor. Except for the first two listed below they have been the subject of correspondence with the Mayor and General Manager. Paraphrased, the response to my questions has been that the matter is an operational matter and it seems that by implication such questions have been deemed to have immunity from any enquiry at all. Quite simply, I contest that proposition.

Indeed, it would seem to me that the information I am seeking should be on the public record and that there would be, nor should be, no viable issue of confidentiality attached to it – See correspondence copied below. Furthermore, under the City of Launceston’s published Organisational Values there should be ready access to such information.

The information that I am seeking is:
  1. DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence, 18A High St. Launceston (all parts of the Planning Application)
  2. Any and all correspondence, file notes, records of meetings and the like leading up to the appointment of Ashley Brooke to assess DA 0331/2015 and the days following until the date of the council meeting (12 October 2015).
  3. Confirmation of the fact that the City of Launceston retains the services of a consultancy “Sport and Leisure (?)” and a Mr. J Corbett specifically relative to Launceston Aquatic’s operation;
  4. A copy of the consultant’s brief relative to that consultancy;
  5. Confirmation of the date of the consultant’s appointment;
  6. The anticipated, and an all inclusive, cost to Council, and thus Launceston ratepayers, in regard to this consultancy;
  7. The anticipated date when the consultant’s advice will be made available to Council and the public – interim and final; and
  8. Confirmation or otherwise that the General Manager has been granted Delegated Authority in respect to policy determination for the QVMAG.

Can you please advise me as to how I should proceed in order that I may gain this information most expediently and if there is some simpler alternative to a Right To Information Request in this instance.

I look forward with interest to your response and to being able to progress my request for information.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network




PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com
40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69

|||||||||
Forwarded Message
Message
From: Lisa Doolan <Lisa.Doolan@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:09:34 +0000
To: "raynorman7250@bigpond.com" <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE Again: CoL QVMAG Governance & Resolutions

Dear Mr Norman,
 
I am responding to your email on the matter of QVMAG Governance & Resolutions.
I refer to the letter sent to you dated 28 September in which I provided an answer to these questions.
I have nothing further to add to this information.
Yours sincerely
 
Albert van Zetten
MAYOR

Message
From: Robert Dobrzynski <Robert.Dobrzynski@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 05:18:59 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Cc: Rod Sweetnam <Rod.Sweetnam@launceston.tas.gov.au>, Mayor <Mayor@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Subject: Re: Launceston Aquatic

Hi Ray,
The operation of the Launceston Aquatic Centre is undertaken by the General Manager consistent with Council policy and utilising the General Manager's powers and authorities under legislation.
It is not, nor will it be my intention to engage in an ongoing commentary on these matters.
Regards
Robert
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Oct 2015, at 3:28 pm, Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com<mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com>> wrote:
Dear Robert,
It has been drawn to my attention that the City of Launceston retains the services of an outside and independent consultant in regard to the management of the Launceston Aquatic Centre. Can you please confirm that this is indeed the case?
Furthermore, there is considerable confusion in regard to what the consultant’s brief may actually be. Given this, can you please provide:
  1.  A copy of the consultant’s brief;
  2.  Confirmation of the date of the consultant’s appointment;
  3.  The anticipated, and an all inclusive, cost to Council, and thus Launceston ratepayers, in regard to this consultancy; and
  4.  The anticipated date when the consultant’s advice will be made available to Council and the public – interim and final.
If it is the case that consultant has already reported to Council, can you please direct me to the report and provide me with an assessment of the value of the consultant’s services.
I look forward to your early clarification of the current circumstances in regard to this matter.
Regards,
Ray
Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network

||||||||||
Message
From: Robert Dobrzynski <Robert.Dobrzynski@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 05:15:54 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Cc: Richard Mulvaney <Richard.Mulvaney@launceston.tas.gov.au>, Mayor <Mayor@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Subject: Re: Current QVMAG Governance


Hi Ray,
These are operational matters which will be implemented by the General Manager utilising the powers and authorities which you should be well aware of. It is and will not be my intention to be engaging in any ongoing commentary.
Regards
Robert
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Oct 2015, at 3:27 pm, Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com<mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com>> wrote:
Dear Robert,
I write in reference to Council’s recent adoption/endorsement of the QVMAG Review Committee’s recommendations some six weeks ago.
It appears that as a consequence of all this you have been delegated the authority to determine QVMAG policy. However, I am unable to find any direct reference to that delegation. Can you please direct me to it and/or clarify your current status?
I am also interested in discovering the proposed implementation date for Council’s determination, and I understand unanimous endorsement, for the QVMAG Review Committee’s recommendations – all seven of them.
Furthermore, I am seeking your advice in regard to what expert advice you will be relying upon, in accord with the Local Govt. Act, in regard to the implementation of these seven recommendations/determinations relevant to the governance of the QVMAG.
I look forward to your early advice and clarification in regard to these issues.
Regards,
Ray
Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>

  


 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.


 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.


------ End of Forwarded Message

Friday, 23 October 2015

RE The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Forwarded Message
From: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:03:17 +1100
To: John Davis <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Subject: Re: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good evening John,

Thank you for your prompt response to my requests. In regard to the RTI Form it is as I recall; only available online; or apparently at the Town Hall reception desk; and in a format that requires that I use a typewriter to fill it in
or do so in my handwriting. As I do not own a typewriter, and in the interests of clarity, I’m assuming that it would be appropriate, and acceptable, to digitally reconstruct the form to enable me to complete it on my computer.

Also, since I am a pensioner I am assuming that the $37.00 fee would be waived in this instance. If so what verification do you require to establish my pensioner status. If not, why am I required to pay this fee and would it apply for each specific request?

In the past I have provided a digital scan of my current pension card. Would that satisfy your administrative need to establish my pensioner bona fides?

In regard to ITEM 8, Are you in fact telling me that the General Manager is operating under Section 62 of Tasmania’s Local Govt. Act? I am aware of this provision of the Act but I have not arrived at a conclusion that it applies by inference and automatically.  Nonetheless, is Section 62 presumed/assumed in this case as I do not believe that Council specifically, or formally, made such a determination?

Maybe Council did make such an instruction, and if so, can you direct me to the minuted record? If it hasn’t been minuted, is there any guidance anywhere to justify what may be the presumably automatic assumption that it is the case? Given that we are dealing with policy determination here I would appreciate your guidance here.

Finally, am I required to provide a completed form for each separate item of information requested? I look forward to your advice in order that I may proceed with the preparation of the information required.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman <zingHOUSEunlimited> PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com 40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69





On 22/10/2015 4:45 pm, "John Davis" <John.Davis@launceston.tas.gov.au> wrote:

Good afternoon Ray
 
I have looked at your request. The majority of the items will need to be assessed under the Right to Information Act 2009. The application form for a Right to Information request can be found on our Website at http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/upfiles/lcc/cont/_council/legislation/right_to_information/17fmx016_rti_application_for_assessed_disclosure_2014.pdf

For item 1: DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence, 18A High St. Launceston (all parts of the Planning Application), this information is available as Agenda Item 8.5 at the Council Meeting on 12 October 2015 and can be accessed at the following link - http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=744
 
For item 8: 8.    Confirmation or otherwise that the General Manager has been granted Delegated Authority in respect to policy determination for the QVMAG, I refer you to section 62 of the Local Government Act 1993 which states:
 
62. Functions and powers of general manager
 
 
      (1) The general manager has the following functions:
 
(a) to implement the policies, plans and programs of the council;
 
(b) to implement the decisions of the council;
 
(c) to be responsible for the day-to-day operations and affairs of the council;
 
(d) to provide advice and reports to the council on the exercise and performance of its powers and functions and any other matter requested by the council;
 
(e) to assist the council in the preparation of the strategic plan, annual plan, annual report and assessment of the council's performance against the plans;
 
(f) to coordinate proposals for the development of objectives, policies and programs for the consideration of the council;
 
(g) to liaise with the mayor on the affairs of the council and the performance of its functions;
 
(h) to manage the resources and assets of the council;
 
(i) to perform any other function the council decides.
 
      (2) The general manager may do anything necessary or convenient to perform his or her functions under this or any other Act.

Please submit the remainder of your requests as Right to Information requests and they will be assessed under the Act.
 
Regards
John
 

John Davis I Manager Corporate Strategy I City of Launceston
T 03 6323 3314 I www.launceston.tas.gov.au <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/>
 

From: Ray Norman 7250 [mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 3:52 PM
To: John Davis
Cc: Peter Gutwein [Min Local Govt Tas]; Phillip Hoysted [Dir Local Govt]
Subject: The provision of information relative to CoL operations

Good Afternoon,

Further to our telephone conversation earlier today there are a series questions that I have raised with Council via the General Manager and the Mayor. Except for the first two listed below they have been the subject of correspondence with the Mayor and General Manager. Paraphrased, the response to my questions has been that the matter is an operational matter and it seems that by implication such questions have been deemed to have immunity from any enquiry at all. Quite simply, I contest that proposition.

Indeed, it would seem to me that the information I am seeking should be on the public record and that there would be, nor should be, no viable issue of confidentiality attached to it – See correspondence copied below. Furthermore, under the City of Launceston’s published Organisational Values there should be ready access to such information.

The information that I am seeking is:
  1. DA 0331/2015 Launceston Aquatic Security Fence, 18A High St. Launceston (all parts of the Planning Application)
  2. Any and all correspondence, file notes, records of meetings and the like leading up to the appointment of Ashley Brooke to assess DA 0331/2015 and the days following until the date of the council meeting (12 October 2015).
  3. Confirmation of the fact that the City of Launceston retains the services of a consultancy “Sport and Leisure (?)” and a Mr. J Corbett specifically relative to Launceston Aquatic’s operation;
  4. A copy of the consultant’s brief relative to that consultancy;
  5. Confirmation of the date of the consultant’s appointment;
  6. The anticipated, and an all inclusive, cost to Council, and thus Launceston ratepayers, in regard to this consultancy;
  7. The anticipated date when the consultant’s advice will be made available to Council and the public – interim and final; and
  8. Confirmation or otherwise that the General Manager has been granted Delegated Authority in respect to policy determination for the QVMAG.

Can you please advise me as to how I should proceed in order that I may gain this information most expediently and if there is some simpler alternative to a Right To Information Request in this instance.

I look forward with interest to your response and to being able to progress my request for information.

Regards,

Ray


Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network



PH: 03-6334 2176
EMAIL 1: raynorman7250@bigpond.com
40 Delamere Crescent Trevallyn TAS. 7250
WEBsite: http://www.raynorman7250.blogspot.com

NOTE: WE HAVE CHANGED OUR EMAIL ADDRESS
IT’S NOW raynorman7250@bigpond.com

CLICK HERE: http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au/lcc/index.php?c=69

|||||||||
Forwarded Message
Message
From: Lisa Doolan <Lisa.Doolan@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:09:34 +0000
To: "raynorman7250@bigpond.com" <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Subject: RE Again: CoL QVMAG Governance & Resolutions

Dear Mr Norman,
 
I am responding to your email on the matter of QVMAG Governance & Resolutions.
I refer to the letter sent to you dated 28 September in which I provided an answer to these questions.
I have nothing further to add to this information.
Yours sincerely
 
Albert van Zetten
MAYOR

Message
From: Robert Dobrzynski <Robert.Dobrzynski@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 05:18:59 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Cc: Rod Sweetnam <Rod.Sweetnam@launceston.tas.gov.au>, Mayor <Mayor@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Subject: Re: Launceston Aquatic

Hi Ray,
The operation of the Launceston Aquatic Centre is undertaken by the General Manager consistent with Council policy and utilising the General Manager's powers and authorities under legislation.
It is not, nor will it be my intention to engage in an ongoing commentary on these matters.
Regards
Robert
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Oct 2015, at 3:28 pm, Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com<mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com>> wrote:
Dear Robert,
It has been drawn to my attention that the City of Launceston retains the services of an outside and independent consultant in regard to the management of the Launceston Aquatic Centre. Can you please confirm that this is indeed the case?
Furthermore, there is considerable confusion in regard to what the consultant’s brief may actually be. Given this, can you please provide:
  1.  A copy of the consultant’s brief;
  2.  Confirmation of the date of the consultant’s appointment;
  3.  The anticipated, and an all inclusive, cost to Council, and thus Launceston ratepayers, in regard to this consultancy; and
  4.  The anticipated date when the consultant’s advice will be made available to Council and the public – interim and final.
If it is the case that consultant has already reported to Council, can you please direct me to the report and provide me with an assessment of the value of the consultant’s services.
I look forward to your early clarification of the current circumstances in regard to this matter.
Regards,
Ray
Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>
The lifestyle design enterprise and research network

||||||||||
Message
From: Robert Dobrzynski <Robert.Dobrzynski@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 05:15:54 +0000
To: Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com>
Cc: Richard Mulvaney <Richard.Mulvaney@launceston.tas.gov.au>, Mayor <Mayor@launceston.tas.gov.au>
Subject: Re: Current QVMAG Governance


Hi Ray,
These are operational matters which will be implemented by the General Manager utilising the powers and authorities which you should be well aware of. It is and will not be my intention to be engaging in any ongoing commentary.
Regards
Robert
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Oct 2015, at 3:27 pm, Ray Norman 7250 <raynorman7250@bigpond.com<mailto:raynorman7250@bigpond.com>> wrote:
Dear Robert,
I write in reference to Council’s recent adoption/endorsement of the QVMAG Review Committee’s recommendations some six weeks ago.
It appears that as a consequence of all this you have been delegated the authority to determine QVMAG policy. However, I am unable to find any direct reference to that delegation. Can you please direct me to it and/or clarify your current status?
I am also interested in discovering the proposed implementation date for Council’s determination, and I understand unanimous endorsement, for the QVMAG Review Committee’s recommendations – all seven of them.
Furthermore, I am seeking your advice in regard to what expert advice you will be relying upon, in accord with the Local Govt. Act, in regard to the implementation of these seven recommendations/determinations relevant to the governance of the QVMAG.
I look forward to your early advice and clarification in regard to these issues.
Regards,
Ray
Ray Norman
<zingHOUSEunlimited>

 


 <https://twitter.com/LtonCityCouncil>  <http://www.youtube.com/user/LauncestonCtyCouncil>  <http://www.launceston.tas.gov.au>  <http://yourvoiceyourlaunceston.com.au/>

Please consider the environment before printing this, or any other e-mail or document.

________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

Information in this transmission is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised and you should delete/destroy all copies and notify the sender. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.

This disclaimer has been automatically added.



------ End of Forwarded Message